to go or not to go*
I have one weekend off this summer and it's a week away. We had planned to go camping which I haven't done in years due to work and the whole being a big city kinda girl.
So I'm a big city kinda girl trapped in Reykjavík. Kinda funny really since Reykjavík is very far from being a big city even though Icelanders in general like to think it is. Reykjavík and the surrounding towns, collectively known as The BIG Reykjavík Area, stretches over more area than alot of large and higly populated cities but there are still only around 110thousand people who live here. Granted it is more than third of the contry's population but still small.
Alot of people make fun of me for never going camping, for loving cities, for rather wanting to go to a hectic, big, stressfild city to relax then go camping in the rain and cold doing the whole back to nature thingy.
Don't get me wrong, I like nature, I like camping, I went on a 6 week camping trip in America but given the choice, London is much more of a break than freesing my ugly ass off in some beautiful-but-can't-reaaly-see-it-because-of-all-the-rain-place.
Which brings me to my dilemma, I could not go camping and go to London instead!!! When I was sixteen I went to London for a week on my own and fell completely in love with it. Now they're offering seats to London for 12000 krónur (the Icelandic monetary currency, roughly translates to 165USD)And with prices in Iceland, I would spend three times that to go camping... And it's London!!!
The thing is that all my friends are going camping and I don't really have anyone to take with me as a security blancet to London. Not that I really need one but still... So people what should I do?
don't you just hate those Shakesperian wordplay thingies?
